My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/18/2003 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
02/18/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:25 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:00:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
2/18/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 2/18/2003 <br />amounts will fall below the $5.8 million that was originally set as the maximum by City <br />Council subject to the pending legislation tonight. <br />5) On February 12, he provided a memo to the Service and Safety Directors regarding <br />Canterbury Road; specifically, traffic control devices near the intersection of Sweetbrier <br />and Canterbury and also the handicapped ramp on the southwest corner. <br />6) On February 15, he attended one of a series of Finance Committee meetings that are <br />being held by City Council regarding the 2003 budget and answered questions regarding <br />the Law Department's budget for 2003. <br />7) On February 16, he reviewed and revised almost all of the library construction <br />contracts to have them in shape for execution as soon as possible. <br />8) On February 17, he spent the afternoon with the Cuyahoga County Law Directors' <br />Association attending the annual municipal law workshop. There were two extremely <br />timely topics that were addressed at the meeting. One was a presentation by Stanley <br />Dubowski, a partner at Calfee Halter & Griswold, who gave some good tips on the <br />construction contract bidding process and change orders. That information will be useful <br />as the new library is being constructed. The second good topic was on the relatively new <br />state right-of--way legislation that was passed last October. This is an area that the City of <br />North Olmsted should def nitely get into in the relatively new future. A couple of larger <br />cities, Dayton and Toledo, have passed new right-of--way legislation and the rates are <br />being challenged before the PUCO by utility companies. Depending on how those things <br />shake out before the PUCO and the appellate process, the City of North Olmsted will get <br />some good guidance on how to craft good right-of--way legislation that will enable us to <br />hopefully pass on to the utility companies and the telecommunications providers some of <br />the costs that we now bear from the General Fund in providing engineering inspection <br />services, etc. <br />Finance Director Copfer: 1) With regard to the budget problems going on down at the <br />state level, it seems that the House version of the budget to fix this year's state budget <br />which ends June 30, has taken out any cuts to local government funding. This is the local <br />government fund and local government revenue assistance program, which gets <br />distributed to the county and then gets distributed out. That is good news. It is still in the <br />two-year bi-annual budget, but there are discussion of freezing that rate, which would <br />Limit the growth but is better than cutting it. However, the two-year budget contains a gas <br />tax increase, and the impact of that on the city is not known at this time. The city <br />currently receives approximately three hundred thousand dollars in gas tax monies a year. <br />The increase would be redistributed back to the city, and those monies would go into <br />funds that are restricted by state law for the maintenance and repair of streets in the city. <br />2) The City of Fairview Park has passed the amendment to the capital agreement. We are <br />in the process of getting the documents prepared and signed by our city and also their <br />officials in Fairview. Once that is completed, within 10 days they will be paying us <br />$347,267.58, which is going into the sanitary sewer fund. These are debt service <br />payments that bring Fairview Park from 1996 through 2002. They will then be current by <br />paying on asemi-annual basis. The city sewer fund has already paid the debt to the bond <br />retirement fund, and the bond retirement fund has paid the debt over those years. These <br />monies should go back to repay the sanitary sewer fund. <br />2 <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.