Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 11/16/2004 <br />^ November 12, the city's insurance defense counsel filed an answer in the Ganley <br />~' lawsuit. He will continue to keep Council up-to-date on the progress in that case <br />consistent with the discussions in executive session. <br />2) Collective bargaining update: <br />^ The Service Unit collective bargaining agreement, which Council approved last <br />month, was signed by all parties on November 4. <br />^ The Fire Fighters collective bargaining agreement, approved by Council at the last <br />regular Council meeting, was signed by all parties on November 9. <br />^ At this point, we now have only the ClericaUTechnical and the Dispatcher collective <br />bargaining agreements unsigned. ClericaUTechnical legislation is before Council for <br />approval tonight. There are some final language issues to be worked out in the <br />Dispatcher's contract. Hopefully, it will be presented to Council at the next meeting. <br />3) He has attended meetings relating to renewal of the NOMBL operating agreement on <br />November 4 and 15. He has provided Council with a status report under the cover of <br />attorney/client privilege regarding progress in those negotiations and will continue to <br />keep Council apprised as he knows there area lot of rumors regarding RTA and <br />NOMBL. He believes it's important not to confirm or deny rumors but to continue to sit <br />down with RTA and make every effort at the bargaining table to continue good bus <br />transit service in the western suburbs, to protect the rights of our city employees who <br />work hard for that bus line and to protect the City of North Olmsted. <br />4) November 8, he attended the first of a number of upcoming fire fighters' arbitration <br />hearings relating to management issues in the Fire Dept. He testified at the hearing on <br />behalf of the city primarily on the issue of which city official may execute and thereby <br />legally bind the City of North Olmsted to the obligations of a written contract. Under the <br />city's Charter, the answer is clear: it's only the Mayor. <br />5) November 9 and 16, he attended Board of Control and directors' meetings at City Hall. <br />6) November 10, he provided formal legal advice to the Mayor and Council regarding the <br />Charter requirements for Planning Commission review of the site selection process for <br />the new fire station. That dovetails into the Mayor's comments regarding the timeline <br />that's been tentatively established by the Safety Director. He would commend the Safety <br />Director on putting forth a lot of effort very recently and assembling city officials to start <br />the process of establishing a firm timeline. Now that the voters have approved it, we <br />have an obligation as city officials to move with all appropriate speed to acquire the land <br />and build a building. <br />7) November 10, he requested an opinion from the Finance Director regarding <br />expenditures made by the city to Joe Rice & Associates. The Finance Director concluded <br />that the expenditures were authorized and lawful. There still remains, however, an issue <br />which he would like to address with Council at some future time regarding whether <br />expenditures should be made with or without written contracts. By Charter, only <br />expenditures in excess of $25,000 are required to be bid and must be made pursuant to <br />written contract. However, there obviously maybe other instances in which expenditures <br />involving lesser amounts should be made pursuant to written contract in order to fully <br />protect the city's interests. <br />8) November 11, he attended the Veterans' Day ceremonies at City Hall. <br />9) November 12, he attended and testified at the second of the fire fighter arbitration <br />hearings involving city management authority. This particular arbitration involved the <br />3 <br /> <br />