Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 9/7/2004 <br />and Nashaz; Director of Law Dubelko, Director of Finance Copfer, Director of Safety <br />Jesse and Director of Personnel Farver. There was one item on the agenda that evening, <br />and that was a discussion of 2004-133, an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to emer into a <br />one-yeaz personal services agreement with the law firm of Radernaker, Malty, <br />McClelland & Greve to provide professional and specialized legal services and declaring <br />an emergency. Mr. Dubelko and Ms. Farver explained the ordinance and the need to <br />continue in our relationship with ltademaker, Malty, McClelland & Greve to provide <br />services for workers' compensation representation, which as was discussed, is their <br />specialty. It was further discussed that they have been representing the city for about as <br />long as anybody could remember. That there was a prior contract that was entered into <br />Last year that had expired. It should be named that previous history of service generally <br />fell within the range of between $3,000 and $6,000 per yeaz for worker's compensation <br />matters. We do have one significam case that is actually in the court of Common Pleas <br />right now which will make this yeaz an exception to past yeazs. The billing rate as set <br />forth in the agreement is $135 per hour for attorney time, and $95 per hour for pazalegal <br />time. It should be noted again that the ordinance as originally drafted included a <br />statement that it would be a one-year personal services agreement, which was set forth in <br />a letter that was attached as an exhibit. There was nothing in the original ordinance or the <br />letter indicating the commencement date for the agreement. It also indicated that there <br />would be a limitation of $5,000 in the annual amount. That number was deemed to be <br />unreasonable in light of the fact that we already have numbers that come close to <br />exceeding that amount based upon previous service during the yeaz. So, given the <br />present case in the court of Common Pleas, the committee unanimously recommended <br />approval of Ordinance 2004-133 as amend. The amendments aze as follows: Include <br />in Section 1, "The term of the agreement shall be retroactive to the expiration date of the <br />previous one-year agreement authorized by Ordinance 2003-115 and continued through <br />December 31, 2005." In Section 2, it originally allocated a maximum amount of $5,000, <br />and that is increased to $15,000. (That is the ceiling for right now, but it is ultimately up <br />to appropriation.) Councilman Gazeau moved that Ordinance No. 2004-133 be amended <br />consistent with the amendments as stated. The motion was seconded by Councilman <br />McKay and passed unanimously. Ordinance No. 2004-133 amended. <br />Councilman Miller, chairperson of the Public Safety, Health & Welfaze Committee: 1) <br />On Tuesday, August 31, the Public Safety Committee met. The following legislation was <br />discussed: <br />- Ordinance 2004-128, a resolution urging the Ohio General Assembly to pass <br />legislation banning the use of hand-held cell phones by operators of motor vehicles <br />on the roads and highways of the State of Ohio. This was in regazds to HB 210 which <br />seems to be somewhat stalled. The issue of cell phone use has been discussed at <br />length. No one attending had significantly changed their position. He had previously <br />reported that HB 210 would make use of a hand-held cell phone a primary offense; <br />and, as a result of that, there was one vote in favor of recommending the resolution <br />and one against. After clarification from the Clerk of Council, it was determined that <br />HB 210 would make it a secondary offense. It was decided to carry this into <br />committee meeting this evening for further discussion and clarification. The <br />6 <br />