Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 3/1/2005 <br />Large positions as they aze the only members elected city-wide. This is important as the <br />president is next in line to be the Mayor should something happen. He would also like <br />this proposal to be assigned to a Council committee for discussion. <br />President O'Grady explained that the request to send it to committee is about a year late. <br />He sent that issue to committee about a yeaz ago. The issue now belongs in the Charter <br />Review Commission, and the commission is considering it. He hopes they act on it in <br />such a way that the person who is running this yeaz as awrite-in candidate understands <br />that there may be an issue on the ballot in November to make the next four years the last <br />four years of the office. He does not agree with Mr. Lambert's recommendation to limit <br />the appointment to Council-at-Large members. Additionally, he made a recommendation <br />to the Charter Review Commission to consider eliminating the at-lazge members and <br />expanding the number of wazd members so that we have a greater number of <br />representatives to a small number of constituents within the ward. <br />Councilman McKay said the four wards were created in 1950 when the city had a <br />population of about 5,000. He believes there might be better representation by having <br />seven wards and no at-large positions. Mr. Lambert did not agree as he felt the at-large <br />members have a specific function. The four wards vie for tax dollars and compete to get <br />services. The pie can only be divided up so much. It's the prudent effort of the at-large <br />members who make sure the entire well being of the city is served properly while the <br />ward representatives work diligently to see that their wadds and their constituency are <br />taken care of. Councilman McKay commented that may not always be so if all the at- <br />large members are from one ward. <br />Councilman Miller indicated that he has asked the Law Director to look into whether or <br />not the term of President of Council could be ended after two years. As a courtesy, he <br />has informed the potential write-in candidate of his proposal. <br />Joseph Bouman, 23950 Gessner Road, as a private citizen has become involved in an <br />effort to retain the city bus system. He has been working on the numbers with the help of <br />employees and management of the bus line and a national transit consultant who agreed <br />to work pro bono. The bottom line is that we need a subsidy of $760,000 rather than $1.8 <br />million. This certainly indicates we need time to study this issue because $760,000 is not <br />enough to close down a going business that RTA has admitted exceeds the quality of <br />their operation. At the Town Hall meeting, Congressman Kucinich said, "No one will <br />have anything shoved down their throats. I guarantee it." Also, County Commissioner <br />Jimmy Dimora has written a letter asking for an extension of time. He hopes the city can <br />wait until March 15 to make a decision. <br />Margo Walsh, 5250 Columbia Road, Bridlewood Apartments, is concerned about the <br />NOMBL issue as she rides two buses to get to work everyday. If the city loses NOMBL, <br />some of the drivers could lose their jobs and that is not good. The cleanliness of the <br />NOMBL buses is much better than the RTA buses. Also, she feels the NOMBL drivers <br />are courteous. She also is concerned about the lack of a gate in the fence surrounding the <br />6 <br />