Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 10/3/2006 <br />and it was decided, with the architectural features built into the screen wall and bringing the <br />brick up, that might throw everything off. However, the representatives of Westfield did agree to <br />review the landscaping and increase the landscaping proposal along the screen wall by 35%. <br />That would be subject to the City Forester's review and approval. They felt that was an <br />appropriate compromise to break up the mass of the wall by including some greenery. Some <br />interesting information was brought forward by Westfield, and that is with the completion of <br />this, it will be 93% occupied. They indicated they felt Great Northern was a very important <br />property in their portfolio, noting that its location was one of the more attractive ones in Ohio. <br />They felt it was extremely important to Westfield to continue to grow the operation but did not <br />indicate they were able to come forward at this paint in time with an overall pra~sal to <br />redevelop the mall. Westfield is always looking at redeveloping and adding things to keep it <br />viable and healthy and keep up with the competition at South Park and Cracker Park. It was <br />indicated that they expect, when they come back the next time, it will be with a more <br />comprehensive proposal, but no specifics were given. This is a complicated process with the <br />landowners as all the major anchors own their own properties. They have restrictions in their <br />title about what they have to do with agreements with the mall and it's quite a complicated <br />process. The committee was pleased to hear that it seems to be going in the right direction. If <br />they want to come back and spend money here, the city will always be willing to listen to their <br />plans. It was made very clear by committee and Council members that they need to be sensitive <br />to the aesthetics concerns when developing these projects. With the discussion being completed, <br />the committee unanimously recommended approval subject to the recommendations of the <br />various boards and commissions and further subject to the requirement that the screen wall <br />landscaping would be increased by 35% subject to the City Forester's approval. Councilman <br />Gareau moved that City Council approve the proposal for H & M Clothiers subject to the <br />recommendations of the boards and commissions and further subject to the requirement that the <br />screen wall landscaping would be increased by 3S% and be subject to the City Forester's <br />approval. The motion was seconded by Councilman Miller and passed unanimously. <br />Councilman Barker, chairperson of the Recreation, Public Parks & Buildings Committee: 1) The <br />Recreation Public Parks & Building Committee met on Tuesday September 26, to discuss <br />Resolution 2006-160, a resolution authorizing the Director of Community Life Services to <br />advertise for bids for cleaning services at the Recreation Center and for restrooms at North <br />Olmsted Park and BartonBradley Park, further authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract for <br />said cleaning services with the lowest and best bidder, subject to approval by the Board of <br />Control. Committee Members Barker, Dailey Jones and Gareau, Council members Orlowski, <br />Miller and Tallon, President Kennedy; Mayor O'Grady, Law Director Dubelka, Safety Director <br />Terbrack, Community Life Services Director Dailey and guests were in attendance. Director <br />Dailey handed out exhibit A, which was a list of items required by a vendor to do cleaning of the <br />Recreation Complex. The question was asked on cost of previous years, and Mr. Dailey did not <br />have that information but later e-mailed it to Council with appropriations for 2005 and 2006, a <br />revision for 2005, and what was expensed for 2005. Those numbers were as follows: <br />appropriated for 2005 was $46,000, revised to $48,975, and the year expensed out at $48,324. <br />Money appropriated for 2006 is $48,500. Earlier this year, he, Mr. Orlowski and resident Mrs. <br />Powell took a tour of the facility with Mr. DiSalvo. This tour was requested by Mrs. Powell to <br />show what she felt was not being done by the present company. Those concerns were handled <br />by Mr. DiSalvo and the present company doing the cleaning along with the Recreation <br />9 <br />