Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 9/5/2006 <br />ordinance to make and transfer appropriations for current expenses and other <br />expenditures for the City of North Olmsted for the year ending December 31, 2006. <br />Councilman Gareau moved for suspension of the rules requiring three readings and <br />formal committee review, and the motion was seconded by Councilman Barker. Roll <br />call: Gareau, yes; Barker, yes; Miller, yes; Orlowski, no; Jones, yes; Ryan, yes; Tallon, <br />yes. The motion passed with six yes votes and one no vote. Councilman Gareau moved <br />for adoption, and the motion was seconded by Councilman Barker. Roll call: Gateau, <br />yes; Barker, yes; Ryan, yes; Orlowski, no with comment. He is now and always has been <br />in favor of the ADA entrance remodeling, that is why he signed on as an early sponsor <br />for 2006-153 and 2006-154 which will take a look at the ADA accessibility within all <br />city buildings. He is not in favor of the second floor committee meeting room. He could <br />go along with the second floor extension for future expansion. He believes the costs in <br />regards to the benefits derived are too costly at this time. He believes the square footage <br />of usable floor space in a new committee room will be approximately 85 square feet <br />larger than what we currently have. In a room 18 feet long, it would be 4 3/4 feet wider. <br />In consideration of what the costs are, he believes there's an easier, less expensive <br />alternative to what is being proposed. Roll call continued: Miller, no with comment. He <br />voted for the suspension of the rules because he believes the issue of ADA compliance <br />must be answered and must be answered soon. We must move forward on the project. <br />There are apparently enough votes to support that, and he respects both those who do not <br />and those who do. The reason he is voting no is because, while he supports ADA <br />compliance not just as to the front entrance but as to this area, he feels we've been shown <br />adequate other remedies to fix the problem that are much less expensive. There are <br />mistakes along the way that have potential to cost the residents a considerable amount of <br />money. Also, he is not completely satisfied there want be more expenses yet worked <br />into this project. There is no contingency in this project, and he doesn't think he ever <br />opened the checkbook without limitation. We need to go forward with the ADA <br />compliance issue, and hopes we can ga forward at the dollar amount included in this <br />ordinance. Roll call continued: Tallon, yes with comment. He agrees with Mr. Orlowski <br />and Mr. Miller's comments wholeheartedly. He has been against this project since <br />finding out the overrun in the cost of this project. However, at a recent meeting, a lot of <br />citizens attended and they were of the mind set that, since we have this money available, <br />we should be spending this money. They changed his mind, and he voted yes. He <br />doesn't agree with the project, and he does not think the project is going to give what is <br />wanted. Four feet more on a room is not going to allow much mare room than what we <br />have now. We will have to address that then. He voted yes because the citizens asked <br />him to vote yes, but he sincerely disagrees with the project. Roll call continued: Jones, <br />yes. The motion passed with five yes votes and two no votes. Ordinance No. 2006-149 <br />adopted. <br />Resolution No. 2006-150 was introduced and placed on first reading by Mayor O'Grady. <br />A resolution authorizing the Director of Public Service to solicit bids for the purchase of <br />eight thousand (8,000) tons of rock salt for ice and snow removal per specifications on <br />file in his office, and authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract for said purchase <br />subject to approval by the Board of Control, and declaring an emergency. <br />C <br />9 <br /> <br />