Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" Couacil Miautes of 3/21/2006 <br />the judge with joint stipulations of facts and exhibits. Those were submitted on <br />the March 14. Briefs are due by April 14 from both parties. <br />• Received notice that the city's objections to the transfer of ownership of the liquor <br />permit at Krobar has been set before the Division of Liquor Control for April 13. <br />Finance Director: 1) Attended a minimum staffing committee of the Fire Division on <br />Thursday, March 9. <br />2) This week, employees in the Safety and Service Departments are being trained on the <br />on-line requisition entry and approval through the MLJrIIS system. This is intended to <br />make the process to obtain a purchase order more efficient and effective. The on-line <br />requisition will limit data entry to once city-wide; limit the ability for divisions to issue <br />requisitions when the budget is overdrawn in that line item; will reduce paper and forms <br />costs. The training is going well. <br />3) The Council budget hearing process will come to a close this evening. Had expected, <br />working with a rookie administration, amajority of first-year Council people, and the <br />new accounting system, that the entire process was going to be a disaster. She was <br />pleasantly surprised that did not occur. The budget hearings where the departments made <br />their presentations and Council asked questions were good. Council did not nitpick into <br />the detail. For the most part, the discussions were excellent, and they focused on <br />forward-thinking issues, ideas and concerns that were addressed in the budget and will be <br />addressed. She supported Council's choice to review the entire budget before they made <br />any final decisions. She was disappointed in the wrap-up meeting that, while Council did <br />have good debate amongst themselves, the administration was not adequately able to <br />respond to Council's changes. This was a large missing element because they did not <br />know their initiatives and programs were being held up potentially and cut for Council's <br />issues while they were going through their particular budget hearing. She would have <br />liked to have had the division and department heads to have the opportunity to talk with <br />Council on those particular issues that Council discussed on the last evening. She does <br />ultimately respect that Council has the ultimate authority to control the purse strings. She <br />believes, if Council and the administration had had pre-budget preparation meetings <br />where each had open and honest discussions as to what their priorities were for the <br />coming year and even more long-term, possibly a different budget would be passed this <br />evening. Hopefully, that can be worked in for next year well in advance of the <br />preparation process. She looks forward to assisting both the administration and Council <br />during the remaining part of the year as she hopes they may revisit some of these <br />initiatives and issues that did not make the final cut in this first budget. <br />Councilman Tallon, chairperson of the Finance Committee: 1) The committee met on <br />Tuesday, March 14, 2006. In attendance were all of Council including the Council <br />president, Finance Director Copfer and Service Director Limpert. The purpose of this <br />meeting was to compile all the information and recommendations of the Finance <br />Committee and Council from the previous appropriations meetings. The committee and <br />Council met on February 25, February 28, March 4, March 11, and March 14. The <br />Mayor, Law Director and Finance Director, along with all the Mayor's directors, their <br />division heads, department heads and foremen came before the committee with <br />information to help Council in its formation of the final appropriation ordinance. On <br />4 <br />_ ~„,~.,a , _ _ _ ~ _ rr ~,. <br />