11/07/2007 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes of 11/7/2007 department. The County Board of Health has always been very responsive to the requests of the administration and Council. The committee unanimously recommended adoption by Council. 2) Councilman Orlowski made a motion to return Ordinance 2006-128, as discussed in committee and as presented in written form to Council, back to committee for further review as per reasons cited by the Law Director in his e-mail of October 29, 2007. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ryan. Councilman Gareau noted that this is the legislation concerning the requirement that doors be closed on the facilities that operate spray painting. Roll call: Orlowski, yes; Ryan, yes; Tallon, yes; Jones, no; Barker, no; Gareau, no; Miller, yes. The motion passed with four yes votes and three no votes. Council Member Dailey Jones, chairperson of the Streets & Transportation Committee: 1) The committee met on October 23, 2007. Present were committee members Barker and Jones; Council Members Gareau, Miller and Orlowski; Service Director 1_,i~mpert, Asst. I.,aw Director O'Malley, the City Engineer. The committee met regarding Ordinance 2007-119, at7 ordinance locally designating and naming the entire section of~ County Road .Nos. 76 and 11.8 as located within the City of North Olmsted, from the City's southern corporation line to its northern corporation line, Stearns Road. This puce of legislation. was brought to Council shortly after having received Resolution 2007-1 13, rt resolution urging the Cuyahoga County Engineer to name the new section of County Road 76 from Lorain Road north Co the North Olmsted corporate line Stearns Road. The Law Director had counseled that Resolution 2007-11.3 should be held because the administration was working with the Cuyahoga County Engineer's office on this particular issue and the language that was needed had to be precise and speak to the point which the County ingincer's Office had in place. A concern was raised as to the second ~~'hereas clause asking if the word "extension" should. be deleted from the clause. "Phis clause reads, "Whereas, the. North Olmsted Lat7dmarks Commission has recommended to the administration and the City Council that the currently Linder consttti~ction extension of County Road 76, known as County Road 118, which in North Olmsted will be located hetwcen Lorain Road and the north corporate line of North Olmsted, should continue tip bear the Warne of this honored founding family of North Olmsted." The Service Director stated that, in his conversations with the County Engineer's office, the language in Ordinanec 2007-1 19 was sufficient to name the new section of road being constructed as `~tearns load. Because there was still some question as to whether or not the language ol~ the second whereas clause should he changed to state that the entire leny~th of the ne~v road, both in North Ulrrlsted anal 1~'estlake, is an extension of C'FZ 1 18 (C:'rocl<er Road) rather than o1~C'R 76 (Stearns Road.), the committee requested that the Law Director give leis opinion on the subject. The committee Lunanimously recommended approval ol~~ the legislation by Council. On October 26, 2007, the Law Director responded to the inquiry with an e-mail to Council explaining that he reviewed the origin of the language in Ordinance No. 2007-1.1.9 that was questioned and found that it comes from the second Whereas clause of pendi~t~g Resolution No. 2007--113. So, assuming that the language i^ the original legislative request for Resolution No. 2007-113, which stated that the L.a~ldmarks Commission had requested that CR 76 from the Olmsted 'Township line to the \V~stlakc line be named "Stearns Road" is true, then there is nothing incorrect in the second Whereas clause of Ordinance ?007 -1 l9, which would then simply ret~ect what 7