My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/21/2007 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
08/21/2007 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:14 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 10:04:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
8/21/2007
Year
2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 8/21/2007 <br /> <br />Councilman Orlowski, chairperson of the Public Safety, Health & Welfare Committee: <br />1) The committee met on Monday, August 13, 2007. In attendance were committee <br />members Tallon, Barker and Orlowski; Councilman Miller; the Law Director, Safety <br />Director, Fire Chief, Finance Director, Human Resources Director, Service Director, <br />Chamber of Commerce representative Jim Burns; guests. Agenda items: <br />~ Ordinance 2007-72, an ordinance amending Section 721.01, 721.03 and 721.09 <br />and creating new Section 721.031 of Chapter 721 of the Business Regulation <br />Code (Peddlers, Solicitors and Canvassers) in order to create a "Do Not Knock" <br />registry and to update various other provisions of this chapter of the Business <br />Regulation Code. Parts of 721.03 were discussed, specifically: 72I.03(b)(1){fj. <br />The chairman suggested adding federal EIN to this section, and the Law Director <br />agreed to this addition to the requirement of a Social Security number. In Section <br />721.03(b)(1), Mr. Burns suggested that the word "person" be clarified or defined <br />as to whether we are identifying individuals, companies, corporations, <br />independent contractors, etc. The Law Director agreed that this terminology <br />should be more accurately defined. By city ordinance, the fees charged under <br />Section 721.03 (2)(b), (3)(a), and (3)(b) must accurately reflect the actual cost to <br />the city to implement this ordinance. The Safety Director requested additional <br />time to research these costs. As part of this review, a discussion ensued regarding <br />the cost of software; man hours for inputting, maintaining and recording data; <br />developing a standardized form for the two registries; and the cost of printing and <br />possibly distributing new door stickers for residents signing both registries. There <br />are two different registries for which residents must fill out a form: 1) the <br />peddlers do not knock registry; and (2) the solicitors do not knock registry. At the <br />first committee meeting, the Mayor adamantly stated the city will not print new <br />stickers. Section 721.03(g) states "or upon which there is posted at the entrance a <br />notice which reads "no peddlers" of "no solicitors" as applicable, or words of <br />similar import..." There are two parts to this ordinance, (1) a two part registry <br />systems and (2) a notice, sign or sticker putting on notice the door-to-door peddler <br />or solicitor that the resident does not wish to be bothered. A number of years ago, <br />the city administration printed and made available to the residents of this city door <br />stickers which briefly stated "No peddlers, solicitors, or canvassers allowed" and <br />cited the section of the Codified Ordinances. It was suggested that there are a <br />number of old door stickers still at City Hall which can be distributed to <br />individuals. He is not sure how this would work as they are not accurate to <br />current laws or the proposed changes in the Codified Ordinances. The reference <br />to canvassers needs to be eliminated as current laws do not allow this reference. <br />New stickers reflecting the updated ordinance and code sections are imperative. <br />The first line of defense is at the homeowner's door. Without current, accurate <br />stickers, how can a resident request support in eliminating bothersome door-to- <br />door peddlers and solicitors? The suggestion was made that, when a volume of <br />complaints are received, the administration may react. He would prefer to be pro= <br />active, print the correct door stickers and make them available to the residents. <br />The Law Director adeptly stated that government is in the business of fixing <br />problems. He hopes the administration will act correctly, have new door stickers <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.