Laserfiche WebLink
. 2, <br />Public Hea.ring on Ordinance #2205 11-1-55 <br />Robert Netirton, 27980 Brookpark <br />Pleased with'the benefits which'ccme with the,beautiful park. It sesms anything <br />you do to spoil that in a.ny way would be a detriment to the fine community. , <br />Anything which you do to disenha,nce the beauty of your lovely psrk I f eel should <br />not c cme about. <br />1'aul Careau, 25914 Lorain ftd. <br />In favor of a shopping center;in a strategic location - so it does not mar the <br />beauty of our parka <br />? 4wen Harrison, ' 49$6 Porter: Road. Two beauty spots made hin d.esirous of 2iving in the <br />community. Park was one. The other park (cor..Lorain and Dover) we no longer owno <br />It's a shame this one got away from.us. Wha,t happens to the overflow from the sewage <br />disposal? , <br />Lee Case, 5144 Andrus Most people think there is only one play ground in North Olmsted - there are two. <br />I drive one of those green bqzggies. Haul a lot' of children. About :2/3 of the <br />' children that go to the park ask to get-. off the.bus at East Park Drive. Yl'hat's` <br />the big rhubarb? Let the shopping center in. Let the community grow. <br />Kaseraann.• Jr. <br />hTew shopping centers look pretty good. Would add to the city. Would make the <br />center of tawn attractive. <br />' Geo. Curran, 28120 Brookpark Extension. : - <br />Live within about 300 or 400 feet within where rezoning is going in. Came to <br />council meetings pretty religiously for six vr eight months try3.ng to get street <br />taken over as°a dedicated street. ? <br />Richard Porter, 28062 Brookpark Extension. <br />Street that I live on is not a street, but a lane. It's a privately owried lane. <br />We are not opposed to the ehopping center. k'e have been trying to get water. <br />David r2. Straightj, 23950 Lucile Dr, <br />A sidewalk down East Park or West Park Drive woul.d help to solve the problem. <br />I am for the shopping center. , <br />Charles Histed., 5536 MacKenzie Rd. We have been talking a great deal about East <br />Park Drive and West Park Dr3.ve - not much abaut Lorain ftoad. This`ts a large area <br />which is aoing to be affected. A large project as a shopping center is going to <br />cause other grawth in the area. 1?Jhat plans are in effect to accommodate Maa Kenzie <br />Road - sidewalks - Have developenents of thege other areas been considered? What <br />degree of decaq is going to occur in the present shopping area at Porter Road in <br />North Olmsted? A shopping center at West Park Drive is going to have sano effect <br />on the present shopping area. It may be detrimental to the point of putting some <br />people out of business. Ha.ve other locations been conridered for a ahopping <br />center? <br />Delmar Ernest, 30106 Lorain Rd. <br />Favor shopp3ng center - ftanembered Sepper Developnent. 'Wm. L. Filkins, 5672 Dec?:er ftd. ' <br />Have thought about present merchants. As far as a shopping center is concerned, <br />( I believe we need it. City nust grow,$ and a shopping cerYter is something that will <br />help it grotaq It will benefit in many other wa,ys. Will help present mercha.nts. <br />Peor.le to clear down to Katmns Corners to shop. Reep that_noney in North Olmsted. <br />School Board would benefit. <br />Frieda Taylor,.6165 Barton Rd. <br />Thought there was going to be a shopping center where Loser's used to be. Better <br />location - avray fram parl;. <br />Mrs. 5chmucki, 4951 I,ansing Drive. <br />Do not want convenience of a shopping csnter. Moved out here to get away Yroan <br />things in city. West Parl; Drive mig,ht be turned into a street like Wsst 210. <br />¦ <br />m