Laserfiche WebLink
f 30 <br />Public Hearing on Ordinance #2205 11-1-55 <br />Anrxa Haag, 2613$ Butterrntt Ridge Rd. <br />since North Olmsted is not allowed to have ar?y light industry., we do need reveriue <br />from a shopping center. Council is smart enough and Mayor is a+nart enough, not to <br />cause any harm to our children or in any way spoil our park. Shopping centers now <br />are beautiYul. Look at Berea's -just beautiful. No one could possibly object to <br />I having anything like that near them. I am told that this is t he type we will have. <br />I' We are going to have the finest shops - so what's the big rumpus all about? <br />4 <br />John Freeborn,. 55b9 Porter Rd. ? <br />? Have been'held dot,rn a 1onc, tine - now we are oin? to hava ^ e P <br />? g ? „? thin„ t o say about <br />? it. I am 100% for a shopping center. If you people think it is in the right place, <br />I think we will leave it up to you. <br />Andrew Felmer.* 5169 East Park Drive, <br />Not against a ahopping center, but with tre shopping center will come a 2500 car <br />i parking lot acijacent to the park area. This will be a hazard - children will run <br />? after balls. k00$ 500, 600 chil.dren in park on Satu rday s - t h a t w i l l n o t b e p oss i b l e <br />? with a shopping center. These are just some of the factors. Fairview shopping <br />center just received reduction in valuation - that will happen here. Pr3mary objec- <br />tive is to think of our children. Should do something about entrancPs and exit3, <br />( Tt can be done. It just costa money, <br />? E. B. Glen, 2882 Clague Rd. Ian in favor of a shopping center 100%. <br />? Ra1Ph L. Tellman, 5$5$ Fitch Rd. ' <br />I If we have a shopping cerrter it must have entrances and exits. If it does not have <br />•entrances and exita on West Park Drivep they would have to be on Lorain Rd. Lorain <br />Road is our principal traffic artery. I don't think we would want two additional. <br />I traSfic lf.??..hta between West Park Drive and the next street down. That's whRt it would <br />amount to. We should weigh: that factor when we €,re deciding which is.the lesser <br />I of the two evils - West Park Drive or come out on Lorain Rd. <br />Muriell Eian - 5718 E]mhurst Rd. - <br />I A shopping center wil7. jeopardize our park - If we need the money, we should build it <br />some other place.' <br />I ! . <br />Joe Regnatt; 31Q$?? Lorain Rd. <br />Levy did not pass last'year - why stop shopping center? <br />( :. , . KearneYs 4358 Martin Drive - <br />? Should rezone turnpike - nake safe for our children whether or not there is a <br />? shopping center. _ <br />I