Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 9-5-2017 <br />Ms. Lentz said she wanted to address Council on its Ordinance regarding vicious and <br />dangerous dogs. She said she believes breed specific legislation is wrong and it causes <br />fear in animals that isn't deserved. She said the State of Ohio and her are in agreement on <br />this issue. <br />Ms. Lentz stated currently North Olmsted has breed specific legislation with strict <br />restrictions for owners of several types of dogs. She listed the requirements of the <br />Ordinance. She said in May of 2012 the State lifted its breed specific legislation as part of <br />its vicious dog laws. She also noted with the exception of the breed specific language <br />North Olmsted and Ohio law mirror each other. <br />Ms. Lentz asked the City to lift its restrictions, specifically for pit bulls. She said the pit <br />bull is defined as a people oriented dog and have earned the nickname of "nanny dogs." <br />She said this breed is also one of the only breeds the Veteran Affairs Administration is <br />training to use as service dogs for disabled veterans. <br />Ms. Lentz stated she is a veteran who suffers from anxiety disorder and post-traumatic <br />stress disorder. She said she has been looking for one of these puppies she could train to <br />be her service animal. She stated she found one last month at the Rescue Inn in North <br />Olmsted. She said due to North Olmsted's Ordinance she was turned down as an adoptee. <br />She said breed specific legislation not only hurts the dogs, but the families that love them <br />as well and asks Council to update the Ordinance to match the State of Ohio's. <br />The Mayor thanked Ms. Lentz for her service and opinion on this issue on behalf of <br />himself and all of Council. <br />Benjamin Lamb <br />23112 Summerland Avenue <br />Mr. Lamb stated his driveway issue is continuing with the Building Department. He <br />wrote a letter on August 2°d to the inspector requesting a nine month extension in order to <br />consider his options with his driveway. He said he received a form letter granting a seven <br />month extension. He said he talked with Mr. Russell, the Assistant Building <br />Commissioner, in person. He said while the conversation was cordial, every statement or <br />solution was rebuffed in a negative manner. Mr. Lamb asked about requesting a variance. <br />He said he was told it was too late because one only has ten days from the original letter <br />to request a variance. Mr. Lamb asked if that was stated on the letter and was told yes. He <br />said he has all of his letters and cannot find it on any of them. Mr. Lamb said he sees his <br />driveway as aesthetic, but the Building Department sees it as nonacceptable grass. He <br />said to put in a paved driveway would be about four to five thousand dollars and is a <br />financial burden on a financial retiree, who in thirty years never received a complaint <br />about his driveway. <br />James Snyder <br />23049 Summerland Avenue <br />Mr. Snyder stated in August of 2006 a drunk driver hit him. He had all intentions of <br />redoing his driveway and had the money saved up, but for the next three months he was <br />F <br />