Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 11-17-2020 <br />Councilman Limpert Chairman of the Streets & Transportation Committee: <br />The Streets & Transportation Committee met on Tuesday, November 10, 2020 at 8:29 <br />p.m. Present were committee members Limpert, Kelly and Glassburn; Council members <br />Brossard, Hemann, Schumann and Williamson; Council President Jones; Mayor <br />Kennedy, Director of Human Resources Gallo, Director of Law Gareau, Director of <br />Planning & Development Lieber, City Engineer DiFranco and guests. <br />• Discussed first was Resoltuion 2020-120. A Resolution authorizing the Director <br />of Planning and Community Development to make application on behalf of the <br />City of North Olmsted for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds <br />for the fiscal year 2021 for the Elm Road Rehabilitation Project; further <br />authorizing the Mayor to accept grant funds, if awarded, and to execute contract <br />with Cuyahoga County if required; and declaring an emergency. Director Lieber <br />described it as a flow-through block grant from the County for up to $150,000 in <br />funding, which does not require a match. Elm Road is one of the lowest rated <br />streets in the City, and is located in a low to moderate block grant and <br />improvement fund area. The committee voted 3-0 to recommend to Council. <br />• Discussed next was Resolution 2020-111. A Resolution authorizing and directing <br />the Director of Planning & Community Development to make application to the <br />Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) on behalf of the City of North <br />Olmsted for funding for safety related improvements to Clague Road; and further <br />authorizing funds for the required local match; and further authorizing the Mayor <br />to accept the grant if awarded and to execute a contract for the same, and <br />declaring an emergency. This is a follow-up meeting from one that occurred on <br />October 27. Director Lieber said the cost estimate would be approximately <br />$765,000 for the proposed improvement. An additional third lane would cost $6 <br />million based on a rough estimate, but no formal cost estimate was included as <br />part of the study. There was discussion on why the third lane was not warranted <br />for funding as part of the funding match. NOACA provided a planning level <br />estimate of $765,000 to include resurfacing as is with no safety improvement. The <br />cost to resurface would be shared 50% with the County. Additionally, 10% of the <br />90/10 match related to the $480,000 safety funding application would also be split <br />with the County. The County Public Works typically follows suit with ODOT <br />when it comes with the recommendation out of safety studies and a third lane <br />would be above and beyond what the expected scope would be. Councilman <br />Glassburn said he understood a new turning lane would need to be evaluated as a <br />new project, but wanted a different option proposed as Clague is a major arterial <br />road. Director Lieber noted once the preferred alternative was identified, the <br />consultants' assessment was focused on completing the details of the <br />recommended solution rather than those least preferred by the assessment. She <br />noted the assessment was made with public input and safety data. Councilman <br />Glassburn expressed disappointment with the process and the recommendation. <br />Councilman Kelly reiterated that Clague Road needed a third lane. Councilman <br />Limpert noted the committee understands what the Resolution entails and unless <br />there were additional amendments to the Resolution the committee should move it <br />forward given the uncertainties of COVID and future budgeting. He said it should <br />M <br />