Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 8-17-2021 <br />there are plenty of lead service lines which are from the house to the main and the home <br />owner is responsible for those. <br />Alejandro Chock <br />24677 Randall Dr. <br />Mr. Chock said he was intrigued by the last week's discussion on 2021-47. He said <br />Councilwoman Hemann wants residents to believe Cleveland Water runs nothing more <br />than a lottery program. He said if you look at Ohio's H2O initiative, Ohio EPA's water <br />supply revolving loan and the federal EPA's drinking water state revolving fund these <br />programs make awards based on the competitive ranking of a pool of applicants. Mr. <br />Chock said Councilwoman Hemann called Cleveland Water's program a lottery because <br />North Olmsted isn't guaranteed funding. He said this means Councilwoman Hemann has <br />to claim these other programs are lotteries as well. Mr. Chock said Council is willing to <br />allow residents water fees to go to neighboring communities and patch the lines into <br />perpetuity. He said regarding the concern of having to buy lines back from Cleveland <br />Water if Council thinks it will leave Cleveland Water anytime in the next 50 years, it <br />should leave Cleveland Water today instead of losing money in a system the City has no <br />long term interest in. <br />Mr. Chock next discussed 2021-53, which is related to a pedestrian hybrid beacon at <br />Clague Park. He said he was one of the authors of the Corridor Study, but it is completed <br />and he is speaking as a resident. He said the Corridor Study recommended a turn lane and <br />signal improvements along with the exact same hybrid beacon at the park. He said the <br />project team identified funding for the hybrid beacon and the other safety features at little <br />to no cost to the City taxpayers using ODOT safety funding. He said the administration <br />brought the plan to Council in 2020-111 in October. Mr. Chock said if Council was <br />interested in public safety they could have drafted legislation compelling the <br />administration to pursue funding for just the hybrid beacon, but they did not do that. He <br />said Councilman Kelly and Glassburn effectively killed 2020-111 in committee and now <br />cosponsor legislation to bring the exact same hybrid beacon to Council at taxpayer <br />expense. On April 13th Councilman Glassburn and Hemann both indicated they wanted <br />forgo the recommendations and wanted a different proposal. Mr. Chock said all of the <br />Councilmembers that were opposed are all joined to propose the exact same thing. He <br />said 2021-53 identifies no grants or funding to pay for any of this work. He said by <br />rejecting previous funding for the exact same project it has missed another opportunity to <br />use new money for new projects. Mr. Chock asked why did Council reject the funding for <br />the project it proposes tonight and leave money on the table for other communities to take <br />advantage of. <br />Council President Jones said holding legislation in committee does not kill it. <br />Councilman Brossard gave Mr. Chock the correct pronunciation of his last name. <br />Councilwoman Hemann asked Councilman Limpert if the legislation Mr. Chock <br />referenced was still pending in his committee. <br />Councilman Limpert said yes, it's been held for about four months now. <br />I <br />