My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/11/2022 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
07/11/2022 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2022 12:12:48 PM
Creation date
9/8/2022 11:37:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
7/11/2022
Year
2022
Legislation Title
07/11/2022 Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Special Council Minutes of 07-05-2022 <br />Councilman Scarl voted yes with comment stating that he is a 46 -year resident and wants to be <br />very clear that this has not been an easy vote for him. He has had several conversations with <br />the Administration and looked at all the information Council has received and listened to all the <br />questions and arguments that have been made at multiple Council and Committee Meetings on <br />this topic. Noted that he is comfortable with the process that took place and the information <br />received, stating "the safety of our residents is the most important factor in all of this. If I felt the <br />safety of our residents was at risk, I would be voting no'. He is confident the Administration and <br />the City would not bring this forward if there were concerns about the safety of our residents. <br />Councilman Scarl stated he heard if we cannot stay in North Olmsted, that the dispatching <br />should be moved to Westcom and adding that Westcom is not a viable option at this time. <br />Councilman Scarl further noted that he is not comfortable entering into a contract with an <br />organization that is not even currently certified to dispatch police, as he is not willing to take that <br />chance with the residentssafety. He went on to say, yes, there is a cost savings to this, but let <br />me be clear, my yes vote is not due to a cost savings, my vote is based on our Safety Director, <br />our Police Chief and Fire Chief stating that Chagrin Valley provides a level of service that just <br />cannot be matched in North Olmsted. That is not a knock on our dispatchers, I am proud of the <br />work they've done, but CVD has a level of service that we just cannot match. I trust the experts <br />to say that this will not lower the quality of emergency response, if anything it will make it better <br />for North Olmsted, I take this at their word, and for the reasons stated above, my vote is yes. <br />Councilwoman Williamson voted no with comment stating that we have held a number of <br />meetings to discuss this issue, some of those meetings were very long and there was a lot of <br />information to be discussed and considered. While the meetings focused on the services of <br />CVD and their compatibility with our present needs, the discussions seemed to shift to <br />Westcom. While Westcom is a well-established entity in the Westshore area, it was noted that <br />they may not be able to provide all of the services we would require at this time. Councilwoman <br />Williamson went on to say, it has been my desire to hold this matter in Committee until we could <br />find a solution, if we needed to regionalize. However, pressure was made to move this <br />legislation along, otherwise it would have been pulled for a vote sooner than tonight; this <br />impedes our legislative process. In consideration of the information we have received at this <br />time, what I deem as the only logical alternative is to keep our North Olmsted dispatchers, here, <br />at home in North Olmsted. We have the best group of dispatchers around, they are the best of <br />the best and there is no one who can do a better job. Councilwoman Williamson stated having <br />been a resident who has needed the services of a dispatcher when I first moved into this City, <br />and knowing the compassion, their knowledge, their ability to calm me down. I can't say that we <br />could ever get that from another agency, and thanks to the dispatchers for everything they do. <br />Councilwoman Hemann voted yes with comment stating her background is in Fortune 500 <br />Chapter 11 work. It was heart -breaking to work on things like LTV Steel and tell people that <br />their benefits and wages were being cut. Unfortunately, not all work is easy and dispatch work <br />is not easy. I personally spent time at Chagrin Valley Dispatch for two hours' yesterday, on a <br />holiday, thinking that may afford me the opportunity to hear the greatest number of dispatch <br />calls. They gave me a headset, I sat with a supervisor, they offered me the option to sit with <br />any dispatcher that I wanted. I sat with a supervisor dispatching fire because that seemed the <br />least invasive with regards to LEADS procedures and other things. They are organized in two <br />pods with a supervisor in each pod. During my two hours there, they took in 295 calls. I <br />witnessed a 911 call dropped and brought back by that dispatcher within less than 20 seconds. <br />They do know where you are, they have three to four methods of finding you immediately. The <br />only way they cannot find you is if your cell phone has been turned off because you didn't pay <br />the bill. Councilwoman Hemann noted the legislation they follow provides that your cell phone <br />will dial 911, but if that call drops, they cannot call you back because technically you do not <br />have a number. So that is something that has to be looked at through cell phone carriers not <br />through any dispatch service. Ms. Hemann stated there were welfare checks, lost animals, <br />found animals, fireworks and any number of things. I next went to our own dispatch center, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.